Tag: xmedialab

  • X|Media|Lab Perth “Video + Social” March 2014 conference report

    28th March, Studio Underground, State Theatre Centre of WA

    Charlie Gunningham’s notes

    Welcome to country

    Doolan Leisha Eatts – relating the story of seeing horses for the first time.

    Capitalising on a multi-screen universe – Duane Varan (Audience Labs, Murdoch University, Disney)

    • Greater reach: through on-demand
    • Greater engagement: interactive
    • Greater disposition: now more receptive

    Reach

    • Cross platform: small screens do just as well as TVs for ads because the “viewing angle” remains constant. i.e. mobile devices are viewed closer to the eyes.
    • Media multitasking: concurrent viewing (about 1/3 of TV viewing is done like this) doesn’t work – the “second screen” is the main screen. However, if a “cognitive bridge” is made between the two screens e.g. synchronous content, then the impact is greater.

    Cracking the da Vinci code of online video – Samir Bangara (Qyuki.com)

    • Multi-channel networks are now businesses cf. Disney buying Maker Studios
    • For video delivery mobile will overtake desktop
    • Growth of Google+
    • Impact of the decline of GenXers and the dominance of Millennials
    • End of banner ads (now 0.2% click through rate)
    • Integration of streaming video ads e.g. Facebook news stream
    • Measuring sharing & engagement more important than likes/views
    • Content marketing is now mainstream: storytelling
    • The future is brands partnering with multi-channel networks to connect with suitable content partners. e.g. PewDiePie

    Big advertising’s view of video, social & mobile – Dan Hon (Interactive Creative Director, Weiden+Kennedy)

    Video

    • Video is (only) a content type
    • Strategy: doing the hard work to make it easy
    • Apps “tone” video – for International app?
    • It’s the craft, stupid

    Social

    • Social are networks (audiences) – therefore, know your audience
    • Book reference “It’s complicated” by Danah Boyd
    • Peak concentrated attention (with ubiquitous Facebook), now splintering audiences

    Mobile

    • Mobile is the interface: what the internet is meant to be, and what computers are meant to be

    How to turn content archives into gold – Richard Cardran (tabTV.me)

    Recontextualisation

    • Supercuts vs cut downs (which keep the story arc)
    • Cut up: new or unique meaning e.g. Seinfeld’s “nothing”. Snow White “Wishery” by Pogo (Nick Bertke from Perth)
    • supercut.org
    • Dub titling

    Chicken, egg, Omlette: does social drive media or does media drive social? – Rachel Dixon (COO Viocorp)

    • Convenience always wins, on-demand video
    • Developed Malaysian TonTon VOD site
    • Omniscience fatigue (Coupland) – a post-literate generation?
    • GIFGIF (MIT project)
    • Demand Media (content farm)
    • Video makes it harder to argue against (viewer engages different parts of brain than when reading) – what happens when everything is video, not written material?

    Corey Bridges (VP Marketing Cameron|PACE Group) & Stephen Langsford (Quickflix)

    Dynamics of interactive video – Duane Varan (Audience Labs, Murdoch University, Disney)

    • Choice enhances impact e.g. you post-justify your decisions, but if you get the expectation wrong, the chooser is angry
    • Thumbnails shape first impressions and expectations, then affects viewing experience as well
    • Cognitive processing: interactive ads are better processed i.e. you think about the content
    • Duration effects: longer exposure = higher impact i.e. you have 5mins to persuade, rather than 30 sec
    • Sifting effects: interactive sifts audience vs persuasion e.g. banner ad “the 1 old weird trick to…”
    • Rehearsal effects: interaction is doing, not viewing
    • Anticipation effects: interaction stimulates anticipation, lean forward
    • Environment: program environment effects i.e. funny vs funny congruence
  • X|Media|Lab Perth 2011 report

    Storytelling in a digital age

    Welcome to country by Barry MacKenzie

    • Wadjuk Nyungar representative, shared a story with us about the trap-door spider in Kings Park.
    • Seemed to open the possibility of collaboration as he explained that the stories for his people are “inside” and would wonder what happens when people pass on — would digital storytelling help keep these stories alive?

    Community Collaboration: Embracing the Future of Interactive Storytelling – Esther Lim (San Francisco)

    • Researcher / consultant
    • Exploring how we cater for community collaboration in storytelling.
    • Moving towards blurring the lines between fiction + reality? Stories now come to us. e.g. mocku-Facebook profiles.
    • Problem of “real-time” delivery (over a fixed period), not recorded; can be alleviated with mediated community building, and professional community managers.

    Cross Cultural and Cross Platform Perspectives – Peter Shiao (Beijing, Los Angeles)

    • Serial entrepreneur, trying to build a next generation media company (Orb Media).
    • Company founded on three concepts: transformational (positive change through embedded spirituality or ethos), transborder (US + China) and transmedia (web/film/mobile/event).

    The Art of Interactive Storytelling… Why it is that so many get it wrong and what needs to happen to get it right – Prof Duane Varan (Perth)

    • Murdoch adjunct professor + Disney executive.
    • Beyond :30 research project into new advertising models.
    • Digital media offers the ability to “interact”, a big problem for creating effective narrative.
    • Some findings:
    1. Respect narrative structure: can’t choose ending!
    2. Interaction to facilitate dramatic tension (limit by timing, countdown)
    3. Capitalise on the power of empathy
    4. Intersect the “viewing quest” (answer “why is the viewer there?” UX + common sense)
    5. Don’t rob the viewer the power of choice, especially the harder the choice
    6. “Bridge in” (bring back to main story) at the same time as “branching out” in structure
    7. Limit number of choices so the viewer is not pulled out of the story (2 choices at each point is best)
    8. Capitalise on multi-platform
    9. Adapt as learning from viewer
    10. Whet appetite before interacting

    Old Stories in New Boxes – Universal Form in Changing Media – Marshall Vandruff (Laguna)

    • Sees the creation of new media forms resulting from the fusion and evolution of existing forms. e.g. Vaudeville + Moving stills = movies
    • Story fundamentals that never change:
    • Connects us with others (reverberate emotionally) through a character “like me” protagonist empathy
    • Takes us on a journey (not a tour!) through crises + difficulties in pursuing goals
    • Gives us a thrill through ups and downs (reversals, turning points, twists) that build to a peak of tension, then resolved
    • Gives meaning to lives through how it ends: protagonist responsibility
    • Making stories visual:
    • Film theory: cutting for continuity + cutting for contrast

    Closing the Immersion Loop through Participation – Ana Serrano (Toronto)

    • Entertainment industry very good at immersion, now being asked to allow participation
    • Can be asynchronous or synchronous (harder)
    • Johnny Cash project
    • David Suzuki tweet mash up (background)
    • Facebook “movies”
    • 3D “racting” (ref Neal Stephenson) with Disney characters

    Once Upon A Tablet – Dominic Knight (Sydney)

    • Argues that there is no story that has fully employed the full capability of the iPad.
    • Struggled to make money + make time for online media elements for “The Chaser”, their previous online paper was mostly a flop.

    Transmedia Storytelling – Poonacha Machaiah (Bangalore)

    • Very possible to create “virtual stars”, particularly as so much of our representation is digital.
    • Eternal and ageless!

    Mobile Entertainment, Digital Storytelling, Emerging Markets and the Power of the Mobile Internet – Emma Kaye (Cape Town)

    • South Africa skipped a generation of technology, went straight from the stand-alone PC to a mobile internet.
    • South African mobile content missing localised material, and had little interaction (ignoring the interactive nature of the technology)
    • Enabled village-produced content: 10 “filmmakers” with Blackberries, taught basics, then upload and provide commenting system.
    • eFuBu project on MxIt

    Immersive Environments – Ed Lantz (Los Angeles)

    • Dome cinemas.
    • Shooting for: long scenes, journey-oriented stories.

    Transmedia,Transformation and the Future of Story – Kate McCallum (Los Angeles)

    • Frank Rose – The Art of Immersion.
    • Finding stories arising out of other mediums.
    • Conspiracy For Good project

    The Most Important Questions in Storytelling Today (and None of the Answers) – Kaz Brecher (Los Angeles)

    • Content + Conversation is king
    • Why are you telling the story?
    • What is the right medium?
    • Who are you talking to?
    • Who is hearing the story?
    • How can the audience participate?
    • Does the conversation change the content?
    • Is the story about the environment or experience?
    • Is your story hurting anyone? (particularly for mocku digital artefacts)
    • Do you have what it takes for production (resources, staff etc)
    • Sword & Sworcery EP

    Engaging with Screen-agers – Robyn Kershaw (Melbourne/Perth)

    • As a producer it’s important to listen to the “screenagers” in our lives
    • Digital narrative is a “greenfield” site, traditional media is a “brownfield” site
    • Digital producers are jacks of all trades, understand audience + very connected with them
    • YouTube celebrities (community channel etc)

    Transmedia – Is it the New Vaudeville? – Nicoletta Iacobacci (Geneva)

    Storytelling MeetsTechnology – Rosie Allimonos (London)

    • BBC has built APS system in 2007 (automatic program support) which automagically generates a web site with all the bits needed (been around for ages).
    • Mythology engine (next-generation program support).
    • East enders show E:20 generated approx 4m views
    • Important to label online content as “online extension” not “spinoff”, employ strong TV co-branding to increase the legitimacy.
    • Discovered that viewers appetite for online narrative video is around 12 – 15 min (not digital “snacking”), rather VOD bingeing! (watching show after show)
    • Being Human
    • Dr Who adventure game
    • Originally the cross platform team was a central, separate entity; now staff are embedded into the show’s production teams.